Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CENT · against 820 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #391 of 821 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score82 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CENT · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
| Metric | CENT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 761 reported | 10.2% | 7.7% | 59% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 817 reported | 8.1% | 7.6% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 784 reported | 4.4% | 4.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 770 reported | 10.0% | 8.3% | 57% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 824 reported | 32.6% | 32.0% | 51% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 229.1B INR (≈$2.7B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 4.0B MYR (≈$881M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 391 | 80.7B CNY (≈$11.3B) | 52 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 391 | 1.16T JPY (≈$7.9B) | 52 | 56 |
| 391 | 2.3B CNY (≈$326M) | 52 | 42 |
| 391 | 54.1B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 52 | 41 |
| 391 | 2.9B USD | 52 | 57 |
| 391 | 44.8B EUR (≈$49.3B) | 52 | 48 |
| 391 | 2.3B USD | 52 | 50 |
| 391 | 6.5B USD | 52 | 51 |
| 399 | 3.1B CNY (≈$431M) | 51 | 28 |