Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGM · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #129 of 356 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MGM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | MGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.3% | 4.3% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 6.2% | 8.4% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 18.8% | 5.3% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 32.2% | 35.8% | 46% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 121 | 16.2B USD | 57 | 62 | |
| 129 | 5.9B USD | 56 | 75 | |
| 129 | 383M USD | 56 | 40 | |
| 129 | 6.6B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 129 | 7.9B USD | 56 | 31 | |
| 133 | 727M USD | 55 | 62 | |
| 133 | 846M USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 133 | 2.3B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 136 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score