Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mondelez International, Inc.
How Mondelez International, Inc. stacks up
MDLZ · against 22 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #15 of 23 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MDLZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -2.1% vs peer median 1.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MDLZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MDLZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 23 reported | 6.9% | 5.2% | 73% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 23 reported | -2.1% | 16.8% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 23 reported | 5.1% | 4.1% | 64% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MDLZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.6B EUR (≈$79.8B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 503.8B HKD (≈$64.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 92.4B USD | 90 | 73 | |
| 4 | 47.3B USD | 88 | 47 | |
| 5 | 34.9B GBP (≈$45.4B) | 79 | 60 | |
| 11 | 4.61T INR (≈$55.3B) | 67 | 64 | |
| 11 | 80.1B CAD (≈$58.5B) | 67 | 47 | |
| 13 | 95.6B CHF (≈$109.9B) | 66 | 56 | |
| 14 | 33.5B GBP (≈$43.6B) | 60 | 45 | |
| 15 | 83.1B USD | 58 | 44 | |
| 15 | 861.7B MXN (≈$46.5B) | 58 | 60 | |
| 17 | 139.6B USD | 54 | 53 | |
| 18 | 159.8B USD | 42 | 40 | |
| 18 | 70.1B USD | 42 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score