Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monster Beverage Corporation
How Monster Beverage Corporation stacks up
MNST · against 806 other Consumer Defensive companies
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #78 of 807 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score85 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MNST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 34.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 91% of peers. Revenue growth: 20.4% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 813 reported | 20.4% | 2.8% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 595 reported | 34.8% | 1.4% | 81% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 801 reported | 11.3% | 3.7% | 83% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 78 | 336M MYR (≈$74M) | 90 | 57 | |
| 78 | 65.5B JPY (≈$446M) | 90 | 58 | |
| 78 | 18.2B USD | 90 | 43 | |
| 78 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 90 | 71 | |
| 78 | 92.4B USD | 90 | 73 | |
| 78 | 1.3B USD | 90 | 66 | |
| 86 | 2.6B HKD (≈$330M) | 89 | 84 | |
| 86 | 4.8B HKD (≈$616M) | 89 | 32 | |
| 86 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 89 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score