Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
How Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. stacks up
MCRI · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #117 of 356 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MCRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.5% | 4.3% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 10.3% | 8.4% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 7.6% | 5.3% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 28.3% | 35.8% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 112 | 707M USD | 59 | 74 | |
| 112 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 | |
| 112 | 423M USD | 59 | 33 | |
| 117 | 40.6B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 117 | 2.0B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 117 | 2.2B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 117 | 7.4B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 121 | 327M USD | 57 | 51 | |
| 121 | 604M USD | 57 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score