Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
How Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. stacks up
MCRI · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #139 of 356 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MCRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 48.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 5.1% | 5.9% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 48.5% | 6.2% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 4.3% | 4.1% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 135 | 3.9B USD | 68 | 56 | |
| 135 | 2.8B USD | 68 | 55 | |
| 135 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 135 | 14.5B USD | 68 | 29 | |
| 139 | 2.0B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 139 | 12.1B USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 139 | 770M USD | 67 | 48 | |
| 142 | 24.9B USD | 66 | 49 | |
| 142 | 72.8B USD | 66 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score