Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MCI · against 183 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #18 of 184 · scores higher than 91% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including MCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 160 reported | 0.21× | 0.69× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 171 reported | 0.34 | 0.89 | 96% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 177 reported | 5.97× | 1.59× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 311M USD | 98 | ||
| 2 | 1.5B USD | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 533M USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 5 | 5.1B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 14 | 769M USD | 85 | 35 | |
| 15 | 534M USD | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 89 |
| 16 | 383M USD | 84 |
| 17 | 1.7B USD | 84 | 49 |
| 18 | 352M USD | 84 | 59 |
| 19 | 697M USD | 80 | 51 |
| 20 | 373M USD | 78 | 85 |
| 21 | 302M USD | 78 |
| 22 | 565M USD | 77 | 75 |