Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MCI · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #64 of 399 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including MCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.21× | 0.57× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.34 | 0.67 | 78% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 5.97× | 2.04× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 60 | 748M USD | 85 | 35 | |
| 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 498M USD |
| 85 |
| 90 |
| 62 | 384M USD | 85 |
| 63 | 1.7B USD | 84 | 49 |
| 64 | 353M USD | 84 | 59 |
| 65 | 116.1B ZAR (≈$6.4B) | 84 | 36 |
| 66 | 6.6B BRL (≈$1.2B) | 84 | 50 |
| 67 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 83 | 67 |
| 68 | 8.5B AUD (≈$5.6B) | 83 | 40 |