Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TWFG · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #85 of 399 · scores higher than 79% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TWFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TWFG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.03× | 0.57× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.18 | 0.67 | 92% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 2.56× | 2.04× | 58% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 81 | 1.8B HKD (≈$230M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 82 | 13M GBP (≈$16M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 83 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 79 | 73 | |
| 84 | 308M EUR (≈$338M) | 79 | 40 | |
| 85 | 370M USD | 79 | 85 | |
| 86 | 2.4B SEK (≈$242M) | 79 | ||
| 87 | 350M USD | 78 | ||
| 88 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 78 | 67 | |
| 89 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 78 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score