Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAA · against 76 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #55 of 77 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MAA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 76 reported | 1.02× | 0.73× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 76 reported | 0.73 | 0.80 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 74 reported | 0.05× | 0.74× | 0% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.9B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 2 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 3 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 5 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 51 | 19.1B AUD (≈$12.6B) | 31 | 56 | |
| 52 | 8.8B USD | 30 | 28 | |
| 53 | 15.7B USD | 29 | 48 | |
| 54 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 27 | 58 | |
| 55 | 14.0B USD | 24 | 40 | |
| 56 | 18.3B USD | 24 | 38 | |
| 57 | 7.9B USD | 24 | 54 | |
| 58 | 10.6B CHF (≈$12.2B) | 22 | 29 | |
| 59 | 11.7B USD | 18 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score