Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LW · against 114 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #100 of 115 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including LW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 114 reported | 2.21× | 0.46× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 110 reported | 0.46 | 0.32 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 108 reported | 1.42× | 1.50× | 46% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 3 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 4 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 96 | 54.1B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 14 | 41 | |
| 97 | 4.9B USD | 13 | 64 | |
| 98 | 35.0B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 12 | 13 | |
| 99 | 4.1B USD | 12 | 42 | |
| 100 | 7.6B USD | 11 | 43 | |
| 101 | 6.4B USD | 11 | 29 | |
| 102 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 9 | 36 | |
| 103 | 7.5B USD | 9 | 43 | |
| 104 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 7 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score