Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LW · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #712 of 802 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including LW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 2.21× | 0.44× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.46 | 0.32 | 34% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.42× | 1.53× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 708 | 22.1B GBP (≈$28.7B) | 12 | 46 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 709 |
| 148.0B DKK (≈$22.2B) |
| 12 |
| 56 |
| 710 | 597M USD | 11 | 22 |
| 711 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 11 | 69 |
| 712 | 7.6B USD | 11 | 43 |
| 713 | 70.1B USD | 11 | 47 |
| 714 | 69M EUR (≈$76M) | 11 | 10 |
| 715 | 271.0B KRW (≈$195M) | 11 | 47 |
| 716 | 6.4B USD | 11 | 29 |