Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to lululemon athletica inc.
How lululemon athletica inc. stacks up
LULU · against 160 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
44/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #120 of 161 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LULU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -14.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LULU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LULU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 161 reported | 1.7% | 6.7% | 26% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 138 reported | -14.7% | 8.2% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 160 reported | 7.9% | 9.0% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LULU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 117 | 12.2B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 118 | 15.0B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 45 | 50 | |
| 118 | 12.2B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 120 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 44 | 61 | |
| 120 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 120 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 123 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 124 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 125 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 41 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score