Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lufax Holding Ltd
How Lufax Holding Ltd stacks up
LU · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 269 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including LU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -44.1% vs peer median 5.7%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 96% of peers. EBITDA yield: 29.6% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | Not reported | 5.6% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 29.6% | 6.8% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 1696.4% | 83.1% | 99% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 33 | 3.1B USD | 87 | 36 | |
| 33 | 848M USD | 87 | 36 | |
| 33 | 662M USD | 87 | 37 | |
| 33 | 352M USD | 87 | 62 | |
| 38 | 707M USD | 86 | 48 | |
| 38 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 86 | 58 | |
| 40 | 910M USD | 85 | 60 | |
| 40 | 34.2B MXN (≈$1.8B) | 85 | 81 | |
| 40 | 5.2B USD | 85 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score