Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lufax Holding Ltd
How Lufax Holding Ltd stacks up
LU · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #336 of 367 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including LU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -42.4% vs peer median 10.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 91% of peers. Revenue growth: -31.5% vs peer median 7.4%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | -31.5% | 7.4% | 9% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | -42.4% | 10.0% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 333 | 7.1B EUR (≈$7.8B) | 9 | ||
| 333 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score