Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
How Lantheus Holdings, Inc. stacks up
LNTH · against 191 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #116 of 192 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LNTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.8% vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.4% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LNTH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LNTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 2.3% | 8.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 135 reported | 5.8% | 9.8% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 185 reported | 11.4% | 9.0% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LNTH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 3 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 110 | 3.9B USD | 51 | 58 | |
| 113 | 975.0B INR (≈$11.7B) | 50 | 65 | |
| 113 | 5.8B USD | 50 | 68 | |
| 113 | 11.6B USD | 50 | 57 | |
| 116 | 6.6B USD | 49 | 61 | |
| 117 | 83.0B CNY (≈$11.6B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 118 | 1.30T JPY (≈$8.8B) | 46 | 71 | |
| 118 | 9.0B USD | 46 | 57 | |
| 120 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 45 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score