Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DaVita Inc.
How DaVita Inc. stacks up
DVA · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #603 of 1,217 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including DVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.9% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 6.4% | 6.1% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 14.9% | 9.7% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 6.1% | 5.8% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 603 | 55.7B JPY (≈$379M) | 50 | 64 | |
| 603 | 975.0B INR (≈$11.7B) | 50 | 65 | |
| 603 | 12.0B SEK (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 72 | |
| 603 | 5.8B USD | 50 | 68 | |
| 603 | 11.6B USD | 50 | 57 | |
| 603 | 43.2B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 603 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 603 | 21.1B ZAR (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 60 | |
| 603 | 253M USD | 50 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score