Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Stevanato Group S.p.A.
How Stevanato Group S.p.A. stacks up
STVN · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #591 of 1,217 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including STVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 18.7% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STVN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 7.4% | 6.1% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 18.7% | 9.7% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 6.4% | 5.8% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STVN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 591 | 74.2B SEK (≈$7.4B) | 51 | 55 | |
| 591 | 3.4B SEK (≈$337M) | 51 | 45 | |
| 591 | 32.35T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 51 | 76 | |
| 591 | 4.8B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 591 | 3.9B USD | 51 | 58 | |
| 591 | 1.3B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 603 | 2.9B HKD (≈$366M) | 50 | 47 | |
| 603 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 603 | 55.7B JPY (≈$379M) | 50 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score