Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Life360, Inc.
How Life360, Inc. stacks up
LIF · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #295 of 497 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LIF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LIF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LIF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 3.8% | 1.9% | 72% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 0.7% | 4.0% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 2.7% | 3.3% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 16.8% | 22.1% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LIF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 288 | 283M USD | 40 | 22 | |
| 288 | 285.4B USD | 40 | 63 | |
| 295 | 9.8B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 295 | 10.6B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 295 | 3.7B USD | 39 | 71 | |
| 295 | 112.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 299 | 1.4B USD | 38 | 39 | |
| 299 | 9.5B USD | 38 | 56 | |
| 299 | 3.0B USD | 38 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score