Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
How L3Harris Technologies, Inc. stacks up
LHX · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
46/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #215 of 473 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score89 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including LHX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LHX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LHX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 3.6% | 3.0% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 6.6% | 6.3% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 5.4% | 3.3% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 38.5% | 32.3% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LHX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 215 | 1.3B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 215 | 8.6B USD | 46 | 41 | |
| 215 | 46.8B USD | 46 | 52 | |
| 215 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 37 | |
| 215 | 51.7B USD | 46 | 58 | |
| 215 | 6.6B USD | 46 | 42 | |
| 215 | 3.1B USD | 46 | 64 | |
| 222 | 16.1B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 222 | 28.8B USD | 45 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score