Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Granite Construction Incorporated
How Granite Construction Incorporated stacks up
GVA · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,282 of 2,394 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | -3.2% | 3.8% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 7.4% | 7.0% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 8.0% | 3.7% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 12.9% | 50.5% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,282 | 40.1B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 46 | 50 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score