Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LGI Homes, Inc.
How LGI Homes, Inc. stacks up
LGIH · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #878 of 1,553 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including LGIH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LGIH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LGIH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 6.6% | 4.4% | 69% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 2.9% | 8.8% | 18% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 13.0% | 6.1% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 210.8% | 57.2% | 92% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LGIH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 878 | 3.1B SEK (≈$314M) | 43 | 43 | |
| 878 | 7.5B USD | 43 | 48 | |
| 878 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 43 | 58 | |
| 878 | 16.6B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 878 | 1.0B USD | 43 | 37 | |
| 894 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 53 | |
| 894 | 60.1B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 39 | |
| 894 | 3.7B CNY (≈$525M) | 42 | 72 | |
| 894 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 42 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score