Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GIL · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #878 of 1,553 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GIL · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | GIL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.2% | 4.4% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.2% | 8.8% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 6.9% | 6.1% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 44.4% | 57.2% | 40% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 878 | 15.1B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 878 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.1B USD |
| 43 |
| 35 |
| 878 | 24.8B USD | 43 | 54 |
| 878 | 3.1B SEK (≈$314M) | 43 | 43 |
| 878 | 7.5B USD | 43 | 48 |
| 878 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 43 | 58 |
| 878 | 16.6B USD | 43 | 58 |
| 878 | 1.0B USD | 43 | 37 |
| 894 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 53 |