Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Levi Strauss & Co.
How Levi Strauss & Co. stacks up
LEVI · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,360 of 1,553 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including LEVI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 1.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 0.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LEVI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LEVI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 6.6% | 4.4% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.1% | 8.8% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 6.4% | 6.1% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 25.8% | 57.2% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LEVI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,360 | 78.2B JPY (≈$532M) | 12 | 27 | |
| 1,360 | 4.6B TWD (≈$143M) | 12 | 18 | |
| 1,360 | 290M USD | 12 | 46 | |
| 1,360 | 469M USD | 12 | 36 | |
| 1,360 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 1,360 | 681M AUD (≈$449M) | 12 | 44 | |
| 1,375 | 4.9B CNY (≈$687M) | 11 | 53 | |
| 1,375 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 11 | 9 | |
| 1,375 | 6.1B CNY (≈$854M) | 11 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score