Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lamar Advertising Company
How Lamar Advertising Company stacks up
LAMR · against 59 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #32 of 60 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including LAMR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 26.6% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAMR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 61 reported | 4.4% | 4.7% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 52 reported | 26.6% | 13.7% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 59 reported | 3.9% | 5.4% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAMR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 15.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 28 | 15.7B USD | 62 | 48 | |
| 29 | 12.9B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 30 | 9.0B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 31 | 290.6B THB (≈$8.1B) | 58 | 67 | |
| 32 | 15.9B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 33 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 33 | 12.3B GBP (≈$16.0B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 35 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 54 | 47 | |
| 35 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score