Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lithia Motors, Inc.
How Lithia Motors, Inc. stacks up
LAD · against 245 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #115 of 246 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including LAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.1% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 246 reported | 4.0% | 5.7% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 214 reported | 9.0% | 6.5% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 245 reported | 10.1% | 6.0% | 66% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 113 | 9.4B USD | 61 | 55 | |
| 115 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 60 | 58 | |
| 115 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 67 | |
| 115 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 60 | 82 | |
| 115 | 6.6B USD | 60 | 42 | |
| 119 | 6.8B USD | 59 | 49 | |
| 119 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 59 | 58 | |
| 119 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 59 | 56 | |
| 122 | 24.2B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 58 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score