Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kinder Morgan, Inc.
How Kinder Morgan, Inc. stacks up
KMI · against 32 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #11 of 33 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 27.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.5% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 12.5% | 8.7% | 66% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 27.0% | 3.7% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 1.6% | -1.1% | 63% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 1 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 5 | 60.4B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 7 | 69.4B USD | 82 | 49 | |
| 8 | 53.9B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 9 | 110.5B USD | 73 | 61 | |
| 9 | 81.4B USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 11 | 73.2B USD | 69 | 44 | |
| 12 | 88.6B USD | 66 | 40 | |
| 13 | 58.3B USD | 65 | 51 | |
| 14 | 81.0B USD | 63 | 47 | |
| 15 | 52.4B USD | 62 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score