Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Energy Transfer LP
How Energy Transfer LP stacks up
ET · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #69 of 386 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including ET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.1% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 80% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.0% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 91% of peers. Revenue growth: 33.3% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 33.3% | 0.5% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 11.1% | 1.0% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 10.0% | -1.3% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ET| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 65 | 408M USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 65 | 3.7B USD | 83 | 48 | |
| 65 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 83 | 66 | |
| 69 | 5.5B USD | 82 | 51 | |
| 69 | 69.4B USD | 82 | 49 | |
| 69 | 9.2B USD | 82 | 77 | |
| 69 | 8.4B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 82 | 38 | |
| 73 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 81 | 65 | |
| 73 | 12.5B USD | 81 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score