Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to KLA Corporation
How KLA Corporation stacks up
KLAC · against 37 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 38 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KLAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 20.1% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.0% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KLAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KLAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 11.7% | 18.8% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | 20.1% | 33.0% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 9.0% | 9.4% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KLAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125.2B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 3 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 4 | 207.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 4 | 259.7B USD | 95 | 63 | |
| 21 | 235.6B USD | 69 | 52 | |
| 22 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 65 | 58 | |
| 23 | 136.0B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 24 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 24 | 203.8B USD | 60 | 56 | |
| 26 | 286.5B USD | 58 | 39 | |
| 27 | 303.1B USD | 57 | 58 | |
| 27 | 406.0B USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 29 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 55 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score