Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to International Business Machines Corporation
How International Business Machines Corporation stacks up
IBM · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #510 of 1,669 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including IBM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 81.8% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IBM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IBM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 7.9% | 8.5% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 81.8% | 11.1% | 84% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 4.5% | 4.8% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IBM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 510 | 31.6B TWD (≈$981M) | 69 | 80 | |
| 510 | 258M USD | 69 | 54 | |
| 510 | 26.7B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 510 | 52.3B USD | 69 | 74 | |
| 510 | 235.6B USD | 69 | 52 | |
| 510 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 69 | 39 | |
| 510 | 9.6B USD | 69 | 75 | |
| 510 | 989M EUR (≈$1.1B) | 69 | 54 | |
| 510 | 6.5B USD | 69 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score