Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cisco Systems, Inc.
How Cisco Systems, Inc. stacks up
CSCO · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #710 of 1,669 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 30.7% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CSCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 11.8% | 8.5% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 30.7% | 11.1% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 3.6% | 4.8% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CSCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 710 | 55.0B TWD (≈$1.7B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 710 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 57 | 56 | |
| 710 | 303.1B USD | 57 | 58 | |
| 710 | 1.08T USD | 57 | 84 | |
| 710 | 406.0B USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 710 | 45.2B INR (≈$543M) | 57 | 77 | |
| 710 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 710 | 803.7B EUR (≈$884.1B) | 57 | 76 | |
| 727 | 19.4B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 56 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score