Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kimco Realty Corporation
How Kimco Realty Corporation stacks up
KIM · against 55 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #32 of 56 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including KIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.5% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 57 reported | 4.4% | 4.7% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 48 reported | 3.5% | 14.7% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | 7.5% | 5.2% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 2 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 4 | 15.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 5 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 53 | |
| 29 | 9.0B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 30 | 15.9B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 31 | 12.3B GBP (≈$16.0B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 32 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 54 | 47 | |
| 32 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 34 | 19.3B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 35 | 1.75T INR (≈$21.1B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 35 | 26.9B USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 37 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 50 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score