Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kirby Corporation
How Kirby Corporation stacks up
KEX · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #949 of 2,400 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 6.6% | 4.4% | 58% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 23.9% | 7.1% | 70% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 5.1% | 4.2% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 949 | 79.3B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 949 | 1.2B USD | 60 | 51 | |
| 949 | 881M EUR (≈$970M) | 60 | 48 | |
| 949 | 1.5B USD | 60 | 78 | |
| 949 | 7.4B USD | 60 | 60 | |
| 949 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 949 | 1.5B USD | 60 | 61 | |
| 949 | 220M BRL (≈$40M) | 60 | 35 | |
| 949 | 91.8B USD | 60 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score