Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to KBR, Inc.
How KBR, Inc. stacks up
KBR · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,333 of 2,400 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including KBR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 18.7% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KBR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KBR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | -3.6% | 4.4% | 24% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 18.7% | 7.1% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.9% | 4.2% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KBR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,333 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 1,333 | 60.1B INR (≈$722M) | 44 | 54 | |
| 1,333 | 8.3B USD | 44 | 54 | |
| 1,333 | 28.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 1,333 | 5.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 1,333 | 3.4B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 1,333 | 536M USD | 44 | 28 | |
| 1,333 | 536M USD | 44 | 80 | |
| 1,333 | 20.3B CHF (≈$23.4B) | 44 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score