Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
JPM · against 852 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #389 of 853 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score88 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including JPM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | JPM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 929 reported | 13.5% | 8.7% | 63% | Context only | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 831 reported | 18.9% | 16.1% | 55% | 100% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 903 reported | 10.7% | 8.3% | 61% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68.3B HKD (≈$8.7B) | 95 | 92 | |
| 1 | 820M HKD (≈$105M) | 95 | 90 | |
| 1 | 36.9B HKD (≈$4.7B) | 95 | ||
| 1 | 27.4B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 95 | 51 | |
| 1 | 192M MYR (≈$42M) | 95 | 81 | |
| 389 | 332M USD | 54 | 53 | |
| 389 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 220.1B INR (≈$2.6B) |
| 54 |
| 389 | 73.1B BRL (≈$13.2B) | 54 | 71 |
| 389 | 3.0B USD | 54 | 57 |
| 389 | 876.1B USD | 54 | 52 |
| 389 | 15.0B USD | 54 | 50 |
| 398 | 3.8B NOK (≈$364M) | 53 | 60 |
| 398 | 449M AUD (≈$296M) | 53 | 68 |
| 398 | 3.1B USD | 53 | 49 |