Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IRT · against 157 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #99 of 158 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including IRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 156 reported | 0.70× | 0.82× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 154 reported | 0.98 | 0.83 | 35% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 157 reported | 0.59× | 1.00× | 33% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 95 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 34 | 56 | |
| 96 | 5.2B USD | 33 | 54 | |
| 97 | 6.0B EUR (≈$6.6B) | 33 | 32 | |
| 98 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 32 | 53 | |
| 99 | 3.6B USD | 32 | 39 | |
| 100 | 14.9B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 32 | 24 | |
| 101 | 2.5B USD | 31 | 57 | |
| 102 | 30.6B HKD (≈$3.9B) | 30 | 20 | |
| 103 | 4.2B USD | 30 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score