Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPAR · against 152 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #95 of 153 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including IPAR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IPAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 152 reported | 0.15× | 0.39× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 151 reported | 1.18 | 0.35 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 146 reported | 3.31× | 1.63× | 85% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 91 | 6.5B USD | 46 | 51 | |
| 92 | 3.4B USD | 46 | 54 | |
| 93 | 698.1B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 46 | 35 | |
| 94 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 43 | 54 | |
| 95 | 3.7B USD | 42 | 60 | |
| 96 | 32.4B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 97 | 22.5B MYR (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 57 | |
| 98 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 42 | 68 | |
| 99 | 98.3B TRY (≈$3.0B) | 41 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score