Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FIZZ · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #435 of 802 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including FIZZ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FIZZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.16× | 0.44× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.85 | 0.32 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.39× | 1.53× | 73% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 431 | 573M EUR (≈$630M) | 46 | 66 | |
| 432 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) |
| 46 |
| 68 |
| 433 | 4.0B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 46 | 14 |
| 434 | 983M USD | 46 | 35 |
| 435 | 3.4B USD | 46 | 54 |
| 436 | 698.1B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 46 | 35 |
| 437 | 82M EUR (≈$91M) | 46 | 35 |
| 438 | 188.5B SEK (≈$18.8B) | 45 | 53 |
| 439 | 299M HKD (≈$38M) | 45 | 23 |