Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPAR · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #462 of 802 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including IPAR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IPAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.15× | 0.44× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 1.18 | 0.32 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 3.31× | 1.53× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 458 | 733M EUR (≈$806M) | 43 | 46 | |
| 459 | 751M CAD (≈$548M) | 43 | 42 | |
| 460 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 461 | 17.1B SEK (≈$1.7B) | 43 | 58 | |
| 462 | 3.7B USD | 42 | 60 | |
| 463 | 5.3B CNY (≈$742M) | 42 | 44 | |
| 464 | 32.4B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 465 | 323M SGD (≈$245M) | 42 | 59 | |
| 466 | 22.5B MYR (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score