Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Invitation Homes Inc.
How Invitation Homes Inc. stacks up
INVH · against 62 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 63 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including INVH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.1% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.2% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INVH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INVH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 4.1% | 4.0% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 6.2% | 5.4% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | 6.1% | 5.4% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 57.6% | 54.9% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INVH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 4 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 19 | 14.7B USD | 59 | 61 | |
| 20 | 9.0B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 21 | 94.4B HKD (≈$12.1B) | 55 | 52 | |
| 22 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 23 | 15.7B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 23 | 9.1B USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 25 | 9.4B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 26 | 19.3B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 26 | 14.0B USD | 48 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score