Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ingredion Incorporated
How Ingredion Incorporated stacks up
INGR · against 124 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #24 of 125 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including INGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.7% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | 9.5% | 5.0% | 88% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 16.6% | 9.0% | 88% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 49 reported | 5.8% | 7.1% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 74.1% | 43.2% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 1 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 95 | 64 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 22 | 72.9B HKD (≈$9.3B) | 81 | 61 | |
| 23 | 6.5B USD | 80 | 51 | |
| 24 | 67.3B HKD (≈$8.6B) | 79 | 59 | |
| 24 | 81.9B HKD (≈$10.5B) | 79 | 48 | |
| 24 | 6.1B USD | 79 | 58 | |
| 27 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 78 | 62 | |
| 27 | 3.9B USD | 78 | 64 | |
| 27 | 3.8B USD | 78 | 50 | |
| 30 | 4.9B USD | 77 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score