Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
How ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. stacks up
IMOS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,026 of 1,667 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IMOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMOS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.9% | 2.3% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 11.9% | 4.3% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.3% | 2.7% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 41.5% | 33.4% | 62% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMOS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,026 | 9.68T IDR (≈$600M) | 38 | 30 | |
| 1,026 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score