Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMOS · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,222 of 1,698 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including IMOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.64× | 0.26× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.47 | 0.84 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.39× | 1.83× | 66% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,218 | 431.5B TWD (≈$13.4B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 1,219 | 32.8B USD | 28 | 66 | |
| 1,220 | 6.9B MYR (≈$1.5B) | 28 | 43 | |
| 1,221 | 4.6B CNY (≈$642M) | 28 | 34 | |
| 1,222 | 1.8B USD | 28 | 30 | |
| 1,223 | 10.2B SEK (≈$1.0B) | 28 | 57 | |
| 1,224 | 11.7B TWD (≈$364M) | 28 | 10 | |
| 1,225 | 108.7B USD | 28 | 55 | |
| 1,226 | 454M USD | 28 | 13 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score