Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IHS · against 178 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #174 of 179 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including IHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | Not reported | 0.83× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 174 reported | 0.74 | 0.79 | 55% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 178 reported | 1.93× | 1.02× | 81% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 170 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 9 | 26 | |
| 171 | 56.7B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 9 | 49 | |
| 172 | 4.5B USD | 7 | 49 | |
| 173 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 24 | |
| 174 | 2.9B USD | 5 | 67 | |
| 175 | 5.1B USD | 4 | 23 | |
| 176 | 5.7B USD | 4 | 56 | |
| 177 | 1.7B USD | 2 | 41 | |
| 178 | 2.7B USD | 2 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score