Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IAS · against 132 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #39 of 133 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 74
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including IAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 129 reported | 0.02× | 0.33× | 89% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 126 reported | 1.57 | 0.66 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 129 reported | 4.43× | 1.48× | 91% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 29 | |
| 35 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 36 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 75 | 43 | |
| 37 | 10.3B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 75 | 34 | |
| 38 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 75 | 46 | |
| 39 | 1.7B USD | 74 | 54 | |
| 40 | 2.9B USD | 73 | 57 | |
| 41 | 3.80T KRW (≈$2.7B) | 73 | 66 | |
| 42 | 2.0B USD | 71 | 65 | |
| 43 | 24.0B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 71 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score