Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PPLI · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #137 of 509 · scores higher than 73% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including PPLI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PPLI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 0.28× | 0.40× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 1.06 | 0.61 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 3.69× | 1.37× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 133 | 439M BRL (≈$79M) | 74 | 80 | |
| 134 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 205.5B SAR (≈$55.5B) |
| 74 |
| 61 |
| 135 | 457M USD | 74 | 39 |
| 136 | 3.4B CNY (≈$475M) | 73 | 52 |
| 137 | 2.9B USD | 73 | 57 |
| 138 | 3.80T KRW (≈$2.7B) | 73 | 66 |
| 139 | 4.5B USD | 73 | 64 |
| 140 | 25.1B USD | 73 | 66 |
| 141 | 57M SGD (≈$43M) | 72 | 59 |