Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HUM · against 62 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 63 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including HUM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HUM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 59 reported | 0.76× | 0.50× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 60 reported | 0.74 | 0.72 | 46% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 60 reported | 1.74× | 1.77× | 49% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B USD | 93 | 28 | |
| 2 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 4 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 5 | 25.8B USD | 83 | 75 | |
| 37 | 27.3B USD | 28 | 55 | |
| 38 | 27.5B EUR (≈$30.2B) | 27 | 60 | |
| 39 | 89.7B USD | 27 | 50 | |
| 40 | 28.7B USD | 26 | 52 | |
| 41 | 50.2B USD | 25 | 49 | |
| 42 | 34.6B USD | 25 | 58 | |
| 43 | 49.5B USD | 24 | 53 | |
| 44 | 95.4B AUD (≈$62.9B) | 24 | 48 | |
| 45 | 154.4B BRL (≈$27.8B) | 23 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score