Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GMAB · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,031 of 1,373 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including GMAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GMAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.89× | 0.24× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.70 | 0.53 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.46× | 2.62× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,027 | 1.7B USD | 25 | 44 | |
| 1,028 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 20.8B THB (≈$581M) |
| 25 |
| 63 |
| 1,029 | 2.4B CHF (≈$2.7B) | 25 | 59 |
| 1,030 | 7.13T IDR (≈$442M) | 25 | 57 |
| 1,031 | 34.6B USD | 25 | 58 |
| 1,032 | 1.3B CHF (≈$1.5B) | 25 | 48 |
| 1,033 | 2.0B USD | 25 | 26 |
| 1,034 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 25 | 34 |
| 1,035 | 10.7B USD | 25 | 65 |