Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELV · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,007 of 1,373 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ELV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ELV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.69× | 0.24× | 23% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.71 | 0.53 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 1.52× | 2.62× | 27% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,003 | 384.1B KRW (≈$277M) | 27 | 40 | |
| 1,004 | 9.7B AUD (≈$6.4B) | 27 | 52 | |
| 1,005 | 291M EUR (≈$320M) | 27 | 54 | |
| 1,006 | 287M CHF (≈$329M) | 27 | 47 | |
| 1,007 | 89.7B USD | 27 | 50 | |
| 1,008 | 549M EUR (≈$604M) | 27 | 56 | |
| 1,009 | 110M HKD (≈$14M) | 27 | 28 | |
| 1,010 | 3.7B CNY (≈$517M) | 26 | 24 | |
| 1,011 | 7.2B USD | 26 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score