Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hubbell Incorporated
How Hubbell Incorporated stacks up
HUBB · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #925 of 2,400 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including HUBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HUBB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HUBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 10.6% | 4.4% | 72% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 9.1% | 7.1% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 6.3% | 4.2% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HUBB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 925 | 866M AUD (≈$572M) | 61 | 62 | |
| 925 | 850M USD | 61 | 32 | |
| 925 | 5.3B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 925 | 214.1B INR (≈$2.6B) | 61 | 64 | |
| 925 | 23.7B USD | 61 | 52 | |
| 925 | 5.1B USD | 61 | 53 | |
| 925 | 49.7B USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 925 | 120.7B INR (≈$1.4B) | 61 | 78 | |
| 925 | 103.1B TRY (≈$3.1B) | 61 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score